Canadians? Choice: NAFTA or Medicare; Can't Have Both Says Canadian Action Party
"We've
signed a stunning new trade pact with Canada.
The Canadians don't know what they have signed.
In twenty years, they will be sucked into the U.S. economy."
TORONTO,
ON;(06/04/00) --- Canadians must choose between the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) and Medicare, Canadian Action Party leader, Paul Hellyer,
stated. "In spite of the rhetoric we've been hearing lately, Canadians can't
have both -- because certain clauses in NAFTA threaten the very existence of our
present health-care system. It's time we recognized that the free trade
agreement gives the American government and health-care corporations so much
power that Medicare simply can't survive under its influence."
Mr.
Hellyer said that, after years of relative silence about the connection between
NAFTA and Medicare, evidence is mounting that the trade deal is the real reason
our health-care system is being dismantled.
"Until
now, those who wished to destroy our public, universally-accessible medical
system and bring in a private, American-style system have preferred a kind of
rear-guard attack to a frontal assault. They have deprived the system of more
than $30 billion -- and now claim it doesn't work and needs to be semi- or
fully-privatized.
"This
was a clever tactic because the anti-Medicare lobby didn't have to use free
trade directly --- it could hide behind the deficit. But more and more Canadians
realize what is going on," the CAP leader noted.
Mr.
Hellyer pointed out that two studies of the relationship between NAFTA and
Medicare reveal that the Chretien government must know that Medicare is doomed
under free trade.
According
to former GATT negotiator Mel Clark, American trade law "provides a legal
basis for the US to countervail any or all Canadian exports of goods on the
grounds that government financial assistance for health care is a countervail able
subsidy." (Countervail is a retaliatory trade measure which can be very
costly.)
At
the same time, writes Mr. Clark, Canada cannot legally protect itself from U.S.
countervail on demand. He warns;
"...there are no NAFTA rights Canada can invoke to protect Medicare from
American countervail."
As
well, Mr. Clark notes that Article 1201 of NAFTA "placed all Canadian
health services under the agreement, including the production, distribution,
marketing, sale and delivery of a health service,"... and Articles 1102 and
1202 "require Canada and the Provinces to accord US health 'service
providers? the same treatment they accord Canadian providers without
exception."
"Mr.
Clark has put together a very frightening scenario," said Mr. Hellyer.
"It appears that the Chretien government knows it either has to dismantle
Medicare or face a legitimate threat of countervail from the U.S. -- so that
explains its destructive actions over the past few years."
Mr.
Hellyer also quoted a recent study done by Vancouver lawyer Steven Shrybman for
the Canadian Union of Public Employees. Mr. Shrybman agrees that Canada did not
get an exclusion for health care under NAFTA -- only reservations which he
describes as qualified and ambiguous. In
his study, Mr. Shrybman points out that the U.S. has claimed
that"...notwithstanding these reservations, 'services supplied by a private
firm, on a profit or not-for-profit basis? are entirely subject to NAFTA
investment and services discipline."
In
other words, Premier Ralph Klein's plans to set up private "surgical
facilities" could open the door to an influx of U.S. health-care providers
to that province and others under the terms of NAFTA.
Mr.
Hellyer said anyone looking into the connections between the federal and certain
provincial governments and health-care corporations would not be surprised that
the way is being cleared for private investment dollars. For example, there are
personal and professional connections between health-insurance companies in
Canada and the U.S. and those who claim they are ready to defend Medicare.
A
recent comment made by former Liberal Health Minister Diane Marleau that the
people making the rules for Medicare in Canada "want to please their
friends, the powerful business lobby."
"From
her vantage point as a health minister, Madame Marleau saw first-hand what most
Canadians can only suspect -- that
our well-loved health-care system is being destroyed for the benefit of a
privileged few so they can profit from Canadians? health concerns."
The
opening of domestic markets for the benefit of "for profit" healthcare
corporations is also being pursued at the World Trade Organization under the
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). Canada is putting both healthcare
and education on the table for negotiations.
Mr.
Hellyer concluded that all Canadians who wish to fight to save Medicare must
join forces and work together. He
called on
leaders of
all pro-Medicare organizations to meet and discuss a common
strategy to save the system.
NOTE
the words of Clayton Yeutter, chief U.S. trade negotiator just after the
Canada/U.S. Free Trade Agreement was signed on October 3, 1987.
"We've
signed a stunning new trade pact with Canada.
The Canadians don't know what they have signed.
In twenty years, they will be sucked into the U.S. economy." #
For
more information contact:
Paul
Hellyer - toll free: (877) 629-0841
cap-pac@istar.ca
#